‘If Washington believes that such coercive tactics can sway India’s decisions, it must recognise that today’s India is not the India of a decade ago,’ says SJM
It is time to stay firm and protect national Interest, RSS affiliate Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM) said while expressing “deep concern” over US President Donald Trump’s statement threatening “unspecified penalties” against India’s trade ties with Russia, in addition to the already announced 25 percent tariff hike.
“India’s sovereign right to procure defence equipment to strengthen self-reliance in defence production and to secure crude oil at the most competitive prices—essential to keeping domestic inflation under check—cannot be subjected to external pressure,” said Ashwani Mahajan National, Co- Convener of the Manch
Mahajan said if Washington believes that such coercive tactics can sway India’s decisions, it must recognise that today’s India is not the India of a decade ago. “We are emerging as a global power, demonstrated decisively during Operation Sindoor, and committed to building robust indigenous capabilities in arms production. The United States, too, needs to move beyond the inertia of a unipolar worldview and embrace the reality of a multipolar, cooperative order,” he said
The SJM called it “unfortunate” that “the US has chosen to adopt punitive measures against a strategic partner at a time when the world must collectively respond to the far greater challenge posed by China’s weaponisation of trade and global value chains”
“We congratulate the Government of India for standing firm against pressure during the ongoing India–US Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations. Despite threats of reciprocal tariffs and the missed deadlines of July 9 and July 31, Indian negotiators have rightly resisted attempts to force open our markets to genetically modified (GM) agricultural products, dairy imports, and other sensitive sectors.
“It is worth noting that the US continues to exert pressure on multiple countries to lower tariffs outside the framework of WTO rules, often invoking non-trade considerations under the guise of “reciprocity”. The key sticking points in the current negotiations remain the US demand for market access for GM crops, deregulation of medical devices, and unrestricted cross-border data flows. India, on the other hand, has legitimately sought exemptions from steel, automobile, and pharmaceutical tariffs and defended its policy of data localisation.
“India’s principled stand—that GM food imports threaten both our biodiversity and food security, and that sensitive data must remain within sovereign control—is fully aligned with our long-term national interest.
